Policies & Procedures
Brandon Area Road Network Development Plan
Road, Street, Lane Openings & Closures
Traffic Impact Study Guidelines
Traffic By-Law No. 5463
Assiniboine River Modeling
Wastewater Treatment FAQ
FAQ About Brandon's Drinking Water
Lead Water Services Information
Safe Drinking Water FAQ: Trihalomethanes
Water Filter Rebate Program
Water Utility Master Plan
Water Treatment Plant Upgrade
In today’s society, change is taking place at a staggering pace. Traditional thoughts and practices are no longer accepted and are being replaced or improved constantly. Over the past several decades, automobile travel has significantly increased. As arterial streets become congested, motorists search for alternative routes on residential streets. These streets are multi-purpose facilities, shared by pedestrians, cyclists, automobiles, public transit, trucks and service vehicles. For the most part, residential streets co-exist with various users in relative safety and harmony. However, in more and more cases, this is not true for all communities, with some residential streets developing major traffic concerns. These concerns may be related to traffic volume, traffic speed, street geometry, or any combination of issues. The vehicles causing the problems may be local traffic, non-local traffic, or a combination of both. The result is that traffic dominates or impacts in such a way that some residential streets are no longer perceived as pleasant or safe. Neighborhoods invaded by this traffic are losing their identity and livability. When this situation arises, community residents and local officials demand action to address the traffic and safety problems. In some cases these problems can be solved by traditional means, however, traditional means are not able to be applied in today’s world and new solutions must be considered.
A recent trend in cities and municipalities around the world is to implement a concept called Traffic Calming, which assists in resolving traffic and safety issues on residential streets. Traffic calming is heralded by some city planners as the wave of the future. However, traffic calming is not perceived the same way by everyone. This perception results in considerable variation in the way in which traffic calming is defined and the way in which traffic calming measures are applied in different communities.
What is traffic calming? Definitions of traffic calming vary, some include all three “E’s” of traffic education, enforcement, and engineering. Others focus on engineering measures but include all kinds of concepts that compel drivers to slow down. Traffic calming is characterized by the Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) as:
The Institute of Traffic Engineers defines traffic calming as
The objective and challenge for those implementing traffic calming is to determine the best combination of measures that result in a net improvement (both real and perceived improvement) in the quality of neighbourhood life at a reasonable cost. Much consideration must be given to various factors such as cost, resident’s opinion, public services (i.e. fire, ambulance, police, snow clearing, transit) before implementing traffic calming. These factors can be the most overlooked aspect when trying to implement traffic calming in communities.
The purpose of traffic calming is to restore streets to their intended function. If applied properly, traffic calming techniques allow residential streets to become a more pleasant environment for traffic and pedestrians. On residential streets, traffic calming is intended to achieve one or more of the following objectives:
Two types of traffic calming measures exist, one that seeks to control the volumes along a particular roadway / network and the other which seeks to control the speed. A range of traffic calming measures within both types is described below.
Volume control measures are intended to direct traffic to the appropriate type of roadway facility based on the intended trip. They are often used to reduce cut-through or pass-through traffic by prohibiting certain movements within a neighbourhood. Non-local traffic would thus be directed to collector or arterial roadways, rather than residential streets. Examples of volume control measures include:
Parital ClosuresAdvantage: Very effective at reducing traffic volumes while maintaining two-way pedestrian and bicycle access.
Disadvantage: They may limit residential and commercial access and must be designed to effectively prevent ‘short cuts’ around the barriers.
Full ClosuresAdvantage: Very effective at reducing traffic volumes while maintaining pedestrian and bicycle access.
Disadvantage: They may be expensive, may limit business and residential access, and could require legal procedures.
Advantage: They reduce traffic volumes while maintaining an open intersection and providing full pedestrian and bicycle access.
Disadvantage: They may be expensive and would require curb reconstruction. They may also lead to additional travel for local residents and emergency vehicles.
Right In/Right Out Islands
Advantage: Reduce pass-through traffic and decrease traffic volumes, which could improve noise and air quality.
Disadvantage: May lead to additional travel for local residents and emergency vehicles.
Advantage: Can improve safety by prohibiting dangerous movements while reducing the amount of cut-through traffic that crosses a major street.
Disadvantage: Require sufficient roadway width to accommodate raised median (or expensive reconstruction) and limit turns for local residents and emergency vehicles.
Speed control measures are intended to slow the flow of traffic along a particularly roadway by changes in the roadway geometry. These changes could include horizontal curvature, lane widths, and/or vertical elements within the roadway itself. Examples of speed control measures include:
Advantage: Relatively inexpensive, easily navigable by cyclists and very effective at slowing travel speeds.
Disadvantage: May increase noise and air pollution as well as result in unwanted slowing of emergency vehicles.
Advantage: Provide a smoother ride for large vehicles (emergency vehicles) and are effective at reducing travel speed, though not as effective as speed humps.
Disadvantage: They may increase noise and air pollution, and their aesthetic components (textured materials) can be expensive.
Advantage: Improve both pedestrian and vehicle safety and are effective at reducing travel speeds, though again, not as effective as speed humps.
Disadvantage: They may impact drainage needs and may result in increased noise and air pollution.
Advantage: Very effective a moderating speeds and improving safety.
Disadvantage: Difficult for large vehicles to navigate.
Advantage: Discourage high speeds by forcing frequent turns and are easily negotiable by large vehicles.
Disadvantage: They must be designed appropriately and may be costly to implement (new curb construction).
Advantage: Easily navigable by large vehicles and reduce both travel speed and volumes.
Disadvantage: Not as effective as reducing speed as other measures due to no/minimal horizontal / vertical deflections, and may require cyclists to merge with vehicular traffic.
Center Island Narrowing
Advantage: They increase pedestrian safety, slow travel speed and may reduce traffic volumes.
Disadvantage: Not as effective as reducing speed as other measures due to no/minimal horizontal / vertical deflections.
City of Brandon - 410 9th Street - Brandon MB - R7A 6A2 - Phone: 204. 729. 2186